In objecting for the NPRM by stating that a completely new exclusion isn't expected, Maxim apparently misinterpreted FMVSS No. 224. The phrase “Distinctive goal cars” has always been defined to exclude autos Geared up with tuckunder lifts from the necessities from the criteria. In addition they mentioned that it’s inconsistent https://dotbrasil87776.wikiitemization.com/3652541/getting_my_dotars_rfs_suspension_to_work